The Coming Storm Over Mass E-mails
It seems as if every time I do a talk these days on e-rulemaking and the reserach problems we are tackling, at least one person wants to know whether all this is leading to a new set of rules governing speech. In the March 13, 2006 edition of The New York Times, we begin to see more concrete signs of a coming storm."In the eyes of one conservative group, a lesser-known Senate lobbying proposal would have forced Revolutionary patriots to reveal their leafleting routes to King George.
A fanciful leap, for sure, but what the provision would do is require the disclosure of money spent on the kind of grassroots campaigns that involve paying lobbyists to recruit large numbers of people to call or write or e-mail their lawmakers and press their views on, say, school prayer or trigger locks or greenhouse gases.
To its supporters, the provision would unmask "Astroturf" ventures, fake grassroots operations with big money funneled through shell groups that employ friendly voices and benign names to cajole voters into swamping government officials with messages. Nearly every elected official has felt the onslaught of mass campaigns: phone lines clogged, letter bins overflowing, servers jammed with e-mail."
Since so many organizations and for profit firms (ex., CTSG or Get Active) have been rather cavilier as they generate completely unmanageable amounts of e-mail, we now face the possibility of having less free speech and more regulated speech. Perhaps this will give some cause for retrospection about possibly counterproductive use of IT to flood the government with popular and unpopular sentiment.






